Could a simple arm catheter replace risky neck lines for hard-stick patients?

NCT ID NCT06719869

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This pilot study compares two types of catheters for patients whose veins are difficult to access: a standard central line (inserted into a large vein in the neck, chest, or groin) and a midline catheter (inserted into a vein in the upper arm). The goal is to see if it is practical to run a larger study on this question. Thirty adults with difficult IV access will be randomly assigned to one of the two devices, and researchers will track how well the study procedures work, including recruitment, adherence, and data collection.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Midline intravenous catheter (PowerGlide Pro™ Midline Catheter)
What this could lead to
If successful, this pilot could pave the way for a larger trial that may show midline catheters are a safer, simpler option for patients with difficult veins.
What could go wrong
This is a very small pilot study (30 participants) testing feasibility, not effectiveness. It is too early to draw conclusions about which device is better.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DIFFICULT INTRAVENOUS ACCESS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Länssjukhuset Ryhov

    Jönköping, Region Jönköping, Sweden

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.