Could a simple arm catheter replace risky neck lines for hard-stick patients?
NCT ID NCT06719869
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This pilot study compares two types of catheters for patients whose veins are difficult to access: a standard central line (inserted into a large vein in the neck, chest, or groin) and a midline catheter (inserted into a vein in the upper arm). The goal is to see if it is practical to run a larger study on this question. Thirty adults with difficult IV access will be randomly assigned to one of the two devices, and researchers will track how well the study procedures work, including recruitment, adherence, and data collection.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Midline intravenous catheter (PowerGlide Pro™ Midline Catheter)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this pilot could pave the way for a larger trial that may show midline catheters are a safer, simpler option for patients with difficult veins.
- What could go wrong
- This is a very small pilot study (30 participants) testing feasibility, not effectiveness. It is too early to draw conclusions about which device is better.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
30 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jan 2025
- Finished
-
Sep 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
A government agency
The lead sponsor is a government body.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * • Age 18 and over * DIVA criterium fulfilled; * 2 attempts of venous access by 2 clinicians OR * No visible nor palpable veins OR * History of difficult venous access * 4 - 29 days of catheter dwell time anticipated as assessed by referring clinician. Exclusion Criteria: * Unable to speak Scandinavian * Cognitive Impairment * Is to receive hyperosmolar solutions (600 milliosmoles/L or above). * Is to receive chemotherapy
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Difficult intravenous access are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Länssjukhuset Ryhov
Jönköping, Region Jönköping, Sweden
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.