Pelvic fracture study aims to settle surgery vs. No-Surgery debate

NCT ID NCT07351123

Recruiting now Knowledge-focused Sponsor: University of Maryland, Baltimore Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looks at two ways to treat pelvic fractures in people aged 60 and older: surgery or non-surgical care. Researchers will follow 120 patients to see if a larger trial comparing these treatments is possible. The goal is to understand patient and surgeon preferences and whether data can be collected reliably.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to: If successful, this study could pave the way for a larger trial that determines whether surgery or non-surgical care is better for pelvic fractures in older adults.
What could go wrong: This is a small feasibility study, not a treatment trial. It won't directly answer which treatment is better, and results may not apply to all patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for FRAGILITY FRACTURES OF THE PELVIS (FFP) are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

hip fracture

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

FRAGILITY FRACTURES OF THE PELVIS (FFP) PELVIC FRACTURES

Contacts and locations

Show contact details

Study contacts

Contact

Email: •••••@•••••
Contact

Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

University of Maryland, Baltimore
RECRUITING

Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States

Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.