Can patient feedback fix mental health wards? tiny study tests new team workshops
NCT ID NCT05603325
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested whether a series of six facilitated workshops could help mental health inpatient teams better listen to and act on patient feedback. Nine staff members from one hospital took part. The goal was to see if the approach was feasible and acceptable, not yet to measure improvements in care.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Facilitated team workshops (behavioural intervention)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show a practical way for mental health teams to better listen to patients and improve care experiences.
- What could go wrong
- This is a very small feasibility study with only 9 participants, so results may not apply to other hospitals. It tests whether the approach works, not whether it improves patient outcomes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
9 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Dec 2022
- Finished
-
Sep 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
A government agency
The lead sponsor is a government body.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Patients who are currently inpatients within the acute mental health ward where the study is taking place. Staff members who work within the acute mental health ward where the study is taking place.
- Ages
-
18 to 70 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Patient inclusion criteria: * Adults over the age of 18 who are able to give informed consent * Current inpatient who has been admitted for at least 48 hours * Inpatients who have been assessed by ward staff as able to participate in the study Patient exclusion criteria * Patients who are experiencing acute high distress and/or approach by a researcher is likely to cause more distress. * Patients who have not been in the ward long enough (less than 48hrs) for ward staff to assess their ability to engage with the researcher. Staff inclusion criteria * Staff member who meets one or more of the capital criteria being used to create a team with most chance of effectively engaging and working with patient feedback (Appendix 9) * Staff who are willing to participate in the intervention and the evaluation * Staff whose shift pattern allow them to attend at least 80% of intervention meetings Staff exclusion criteria: * Staff who are unable to attend intervention delivery during the day * Staff who are not members of the clinical or support team
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Patient participation are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
Aberdeen, United Kingdom
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can heart rate reveal how children feel during x-rays?
- A talking hand-sanitizer dispenser may cut hospital infections in older adults
- Massive study tests Droid-Assisted health screenings for rural communities
- Dementia care revolution: staff training aims to ease End-of-Life suffering
- Heart infection survivors test rehab to boost recovery
- Question list boosts cancer Patients' confidence and reduces anxiety