Breathing crisis: which oxygen method saves more lives?
NCT ID NCT04468126
Summary
This study tested two ways to give oxygen to adults hospitalized with sudden, severe breathing failure. Researchers compared standard oxygen therapy to a newer method called high-flow nasal oxygen to see which one led to better survival rates after 28 days. The goal was to find the most effective first treatment to help patients breathe and avoid needing a breathing machine.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ACUTE RESPIRATORY FAILURE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
CHu Poitiers
Poitiers, 86000, France
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.