Neck pain showdown: which manual therapy wins?

NCT ID NCT07599631

Not yet recruiting Symptom relief Sponsor: Cairo University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 2 times

Summary

This study will compare two manual therapy techniques—Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique (INIT) and Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM)—in 60 adults with chronic neck pain. The goal is to see which approach better reduces neck disability, improves muscle endurance, and enhances body awareness. Participants will receive one of the two treatments, and outcomes like pain intensity and neck function will be measured.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: manual therapy techniques (Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique and Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization)
What this could lead to: If one technique proves superior, it could offer a more effective, non-drug option for managing chronic neck pain.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage study (60 people) comparing two therapies, so results may not apply to everyone. It's not testing a new drug or cure.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for NECK PAIN are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Neck Pain

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

NECK PAIN

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.