Head-to-Head: which prostate biopsy method spots cancer better?
NCT ID NCT06517901
Summary
This study aims to determine which of two MRI-guided biopsy techniques is better at detecting serious prostate cancer. Researchers will compare a computer-assisted fusion method against a doctor's visual estimation method in 1,306 men with suspicious MRI findings. The goal is to find out if one approach reliably finds more clinically significant cancers than the other.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PROSTATE CANCER are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Study contacts
-
Contact
Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Locations
-
Albany Medical Center
RECRUITINGAlbany, New York, 12208, United States
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
-
Lahey Clinic, Inc
RECRUITINGBurlington, Massachusetts, 01805, United States
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Contact
-
Manitoba Prostate Centre, CancerCare Manitoba
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGWinnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1M5, Canada
Contact
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
-
Pennsylvania State University
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHershey, Pennsylvania, 17023, United States
Contact
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.