Could a simple ultrasound replace MRI for spotting dangerous prostate cancer?

NCT ID NCT06183905

First seen Jul 21, 2026 · Last updated Jul 22, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two imaging methods—multiparametric ultrasound (mpUS) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)—to see which better detects clinically significant prostate cancer in men scheduled for their first biopsy. Participants receive both scans before biopsy, and if either shows a suspicious area, targeted biopsies are taken alongside standard systematic samples. The goal is to determine whether the less expensive and more widely available ultrasound can match MRI's accuracy in finding aggressive cancers.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Multiparametric ultrasound (mpUS) imaging
What this could lead to
If mpUS proves as accurate as MRI, it could offer a faster, cheaper, and more accessible way to detect significant prostate cancer, reducing the need for MRI scans.
What could go wrong
Ultrasound may not match MRI's sensitivity, and results depend on operator skill. This is a single-center study, so findings may not apply broadly.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PROSTATE BIOPSY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200092, China

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.