New study challenges safety of keyhole surgery for cervical cancer
NCT ID NCT03955185
First seen Jan 05, 2026 · Last updated May 17, 2026 · Updated 20 times
Summary
This study compares two surgical approaches for early-stage cervical cancer: minimally invasive (keyhole or robotic) surgery versus traditional open abdominal surgery. Researchers will follow 2000 patients for up to 5 years to see which method leads to better survival and fewer cancer recurrences. The goal is to provide clear evidence on the safest surgical option.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASM are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.