Less invasive heart bypass could speed recovery, trial tests

NCT ID NCT04795193

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026

Summary

This trial compares two types of heart bypass surgery for people with blocked arteries: a minimally invasive version (MICS-CABG) versus standard surgery. About 248 patients will either choose their preferred surgery or be randomly assigned. The study measures quality of life one month after surgery and how well the new blood vessels stay open. The goal is to see if the less invasive approach leads to a better recovery without compromising long-term results.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery (MICS-CABG) compared to standard off-pump bypass surgery
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that a less invasive heart bypass surgery improves recovery and quality of life while keeping grafts working as well as standard surgery.
What could go wrong
This is a mid-sized trial, not yet proven in larger populations. The benefits may be small, and there are standard surgical risks like bleeding, infection, or heart complications.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS, OFF-PUMP are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Peking University Third Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191, China

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.