Which exercise works best for back pain? McGill vs McKenzie
NCT ID NCT07403292
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compared two popular exercise programs—McGill and McKenzie—in 57 adults aged 20-40 with chronic low back pain lasting at least 6 months. Participants performed either McGill exercises (like curl-ups and bird-dog holds) or McKenzie extension exercises. Researchers measured pain, disability, and spine movement to see which approach offered more relief.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- exercise therapy (McGill exercises or McKenzie exercises)
- What this could lead to
- If one exercise approach proves better, it could guide physiotherapists in choosing the most effective treatment for chronic low back pain.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study with only 57 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Exercise benefits can vary widely between individuals.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CHRONIC MECHANICAL LOW BACK PAIN are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Naseer Hospital
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.