Which exercise works best for back pain? McGill vs McKenzie

NCT ID NCT07403292

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compared two popular exercise programs—McGill and McKenzie—in 57 adults aged 20-40 with chronic low back pain lasting at least 6 months. Participants performed either McGill exercises (like curl-ups and bird-dog holds) or McKenzie extension exercises. Researchers measured pain, disability, and spine movement to see which approach offered more relief.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

exercise therapy (McGill exercises or McKenzie exercises)

What this could lead to

If one exercise approach proves better, it could guide physiotherapists in choosing the most effective treatment for chronic low back pain.

What could go wrong

This is a small, completed study with only 57 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Exercise benefits can vary widely between individuals.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CHRONIC MECHANICAL LOW BACK PAIN are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Pain

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Naseer Hospital

    Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan