3D-Printed expander vs. traditional device: which works better for kids?
NCT ID NCT07262892
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looks at two methods for widening the upper jaw in children aged 6 to 12 with a narrow jaw. One group uses a modern 3D-printed removable expander, another uses a traditional fixed expander, and a third group gets no treatment. Researchers will take 3D scans to measure changes in jaw width, tooth angles, and facial shape over 6 months.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could help orthodontists choose the best expansion method for children, potentially leading to more comfortable and effective treatment.
- What could go wrong
- This is an early-stage observational study with only 60 participants, so results may not apply to all children. The study does not test a new drug or cure, only compares existing devices.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for MAXILLARY TRANSVERSE DEFICIENCY are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Bezmialem Vakif University
RECRUITINGIstanbul, Fatih, 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.