Hands-On therapy showdown: which technique eases SI joint pain best?

NCT ID NCT07645170

Ongoing Symptom relief Sponsor: University of Faisalabad Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares two hands-on therapy techniques for sacroiliac joint dysfunction, a common cause of lower back and buttock pain. Thirty-four adults aged 20 to 40 will receive either strain counter-strain (a gentle positioning method) or Maitland mobilization (a joint oscillation technique) three times a week for four weeks. Researchers will measure pain and daily function before and after treatment to see which approach works better.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: manual therapy techniques (strain counter-strain and Maitland mobilization)
What this could lead to: If successful, this study could show which manual therapy technique is more effective for easing sacroiliac joint pain and improving daily function.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage trial with only 34 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The techniques are manual and rely on therapist skill, which can vary.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for SACROILIAC JOINT DYSFUNCTION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

SACROILIAC JOINT DYSFUNCTION

Contacts and locations

Locations

The University of Faisalabad

Faisalābad, Punjab Province, 3800, Pakistan

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.