Aortic repair breakthrough: which blood flow restore method works best?

NCT ID NCT07697820

First seen Jul 13, 2026 · Last updated Jul 14, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looks at different methods to restore blood flow to the left subclavian artery when it must be covered during aortic repair. Covering this artery can raise the risk of stroke and arm problems. The trial compares surgical bypass with newer endovascular techniques to see which is safer and more effective. It includes adults with aortic aneurysms or dissections who need this type of repair.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Carotid-subclavian bypass (surgical procedure)
What this could lead to
If successful, this study could help doctors choose the safest revascularization method for patients needing aortic repair, reducing the risk of stroke and arm complications.
What could go wrong
This is a small, single-center study with only 50 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. Surgical and endovascular techniques each carry their own risks, such as infection or endoleaks.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for AORTIC ANEURYSM AND DISSECTION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.