AI vs. video: which boosts CPR skill retention?
NCT ID NCT07783932
First seen Aug 25, 2026 · Last updated Aug 26, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tests whether an AI-powered refresher course helps healthcare professionals keep their pediatric resuscitation knowledge and skills sharper than a standard video refresher. Participants first complete simulation-based training, then receive either an interactive AI and virtual reality refresher or a video refresher three months later. At six months, their performance, knowledge, and confidence are compared to see which method better supports long-term retention.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Large language model-based refresher education using a generative AI and virtual reality platform, compared with video-based refresher education
- What this could lead to
- If effective, AI-based refresher training could offer a more engaging and interactive way for healthcare workers to retain life-saving pediatric resuscitation skills over time.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-center study, and the results may not apply broadly. The AI platform's novelty could also introduce technical issues or user unfamiliarity that affect outcomes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 66 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Aug 2026
- Expected to finish
-
Jun 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Healthcare professionals at Samsung Medical Center * Healthcare professionals who have previously received BLS or cardiopulmonary resuscitation training * Individuals who voluntarily agree to participate in the study * Individuals who are able to complete follow-up assessments during the study period Exclusion Criteria: * Individuals who do not wish to participate in the study * Individuals who do not provide consent to participate in the study
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Pediatric advanced life support (PALS) are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Samsung Medical Center
RECRUITINGSeoul, Seoul, 06351, South Korea