Study questions need for routine artery tubes in ICU shock care
NCT ID NCT03680963
Summary
This large study aimed to see if a less invasive approach to monitoring blood pressure is as safe as the standard method for patients in shock. It compared waiting to insert an artery tube only if truly needed versus inserting one right away. The main goal was to see if the less invasive approach resulted in similar or better 28-day survival rates.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ACUTE CIRCULATORY FAILURE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Intensive care
Argenteuil, France
-
Intensive care
Dijon, France
-
Intensive care
La Roche-sur-Yon, France
-
Intensive care
Montauban, France
-
Intensive care
Nantes, France
-
Intensive care
Orléans, France
-
Intensive care
Poitiers, France
-
Intensive care
Strasbourg, France
-
Intensive care
Tours, France
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.