Fast vs. slow corneal treatment: which works better for keratoconus?
NCT ID NCT07194538
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study followed 20 people with progressive keratoconus for one year after they received either a standard 30-minute or a faster 10-minute corneal cross-linking treatment. The goal was to see how well each method stopped the disease from getting worse and improved eye shape and vision. Results will help doctors choose the best treatment option.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for KERATOCONUS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
University Hospital Centre Zagreb
Zagreb, 10 000, Croatia