Fast vs. slow corneal treatment: which works better for keratoconus?
NCT ID NCT07194538
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study followed 20 people with progressive keratoconus for one year after they received either a standard 30-minute or a faster 10-minute corneal cross-linking treatment. The goal was to see how well each method stopped the disease from getting worse and improved eye shape and vision. Results will help doctors choose the best treatment option.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for KERATOCONUS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University Hospital Centre Zagreb
Zagreb, 10 000, Croatia
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a simple eyeglass test sharpen vision in keratoconus?
- Can a donor corneal lenticule patch up a thinning cornea?
- A piece of your own cornea might patch a thinning one — a trial puts it to the test
- Can a simple eye treatment stop the need for a corneal transplant?
- Eye insert could ease allergy symptoms for contact lens wearers
- Promising new eye treatment could halt vision loss from keratoconus