IVF study tracks Kids' milestones to find safest embryo transfer method
NCT ID NCT05502770
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026
Summary
This study follows 700 children born from frozen embryo transfer to see if the way the mother's womb was prepared affects the child's development. Researchers compare three common methods: natural cycle, modified natural cycle, and artificial cycle. Parents answer questionnaires about their child's communication, motor skills, and problem-solving at age 2.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could provide evidence on which endometrial preparation method is safest for children's long-term development.
- What could go wrong
- This is an observational follow-up, not a treatment trial. It cannot prove cause and effect, and results may not apply to all IVF patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CHILD DEVELOPMENT are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
My Duc Hospital
RECRUITINGHo Chi Minh City, 70000, Vietnam
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a Mother's Omega-3 supplement shield preterm Babies' lungs?
- Can music help children heal after domestic violence?
- Could a toddler supplement shape brain power years later?
- Could play be a lifeline for children of war? a major study investigates
- Could a simple home program level the playing field for kids in poverty?
- Toddler screen time and language skills: a closer look