Denture bar showdown: which material keeps jawbone healthier?
NCT ID NCT07429149
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at two different materials for the bar that connects dental implants to a denture in people with no lower teeth. Twelve men aged 50-60 received two implants and were given dentures supported by either a standard metal bar or a newer zirconia bar. The researchers checked bone loss and gum health at the start, 6 months, and 12 months to see which bar worked better.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
12 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jul 2022
- Finished
-
Jun 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
50 to 60 years
- Sex
-
Male participants only
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * • Patients age range was between 50-60 years old. * Only male patients were selected to participate in this study. * All patients were apparently free from any systemic or debilitating diseases that might affect bone metabolism or delay post-operative healing. * Patients were free from any temporo-mandibular joint disorders. * Patients were free from any neuromuscular or bony disorders, and medically free from any neurologic disorder affecting the neuro-muscular system. * Patients' residual alveolar ridges were covered with firm, healthy mucosa, free from any signs of inflammation, ulceration, or flabby tissue. * Mandibular edentulous alveolar ridge areas had sufficient width and height of alveolar bone. * Patients exhibited Angle Class I maxillo-mandibular relationship and sufficient inter-arch space. * Patients had good oral hygiene. * A period of at least six months up to one year had elapsed from the last extraction. Exclusion Criteria: * • Patients with systemic diseases that might affect bone quality, contribute to bone resorption, increase surgical risk, or delay/complicate post-operative healing. * Patients with parafunctional habits such as bruxism, clenching, or grinding. * Patients with residual ridge covered by inflamed, ulcerated, or flabby mucosa. * Patients with inadequate inter-arch space. * Patients with abnormal tongue behavior and/or size. * Patients with xerostomia or excessive salivation. * Heavy smoker patients and alcoholic patients.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Edentulous mandible are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University
Cairo, Nasr City, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.