AI second opinion falters when problems are rare, study finds
NCT ID NCT05272189
Summary
This study aimed to understand how often a problem occurs (its 'prevalence') affects how well people make decisions when they get help from an artificial intelligence (AI) system. Twelve participants completed a computer task where they had to spot 'bad' items, similar to a doctor looking for a disease. Researchers tested if AI advice was more or less helpful when 'bad' items were very common (90% of the time) or very rare (10% of the time). The goal was to gather knowledge about human-AI teamwork, not to treat any medical condition.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DECISION MAKING are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Visual Attention Lab / Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.