Can navigation make hip replacements more precise?
NCT ID NCT05393778
First seen Sep 02, 2026 · Last updated Sep 03, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial tests whether using a navigation system during hip replacement surgery leads to more accurate joint reconstruction than the traditional measured technique. Researchers will compare the surgeon's pre-operative 3-D plan with the actual post-operative result in 100 patients with hip osteoarthritis. The study also tracks patient-reported outcomes like pain, mobility, and quality of life to see if accuracy translates into better recovery.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Two surgical techniques for hip replacement: a measured technique using manual checks, and a navigated technique using the IntelliJoint® navigation system.
- What this could lead to
- If one technique proves more accurate, it could become the preferred method for hip replacement surgery, leading to better pain relief and mobility for patients.
- What could go wrong
- This is a single-center trial with 100 participants, so results may not apply to all patients or surgeons. Both techniques are already in use, but the study may not find a clear winner.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 100 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Jan 2024
- Expected to finish
-
Nov 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients who are signed for a THA for primary or secondary osteoarthritis without overt deformity that would require revision type implants and with good enough bone quality to be listed for uncemented component implantation. Exclusion Criteria: * Secondary OA due to Dysplasia (Hartofilakidis \>1) * Avascular necrosis of the hip with destruction of joint structure * Sequelae of Pediatric deformity with abnormal anatomy * Cemented fixation of femur or acetabulum * Previous arthroplasty-type procedure * Previous septic arthritis of the hip
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Osteoarthritis hip are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Physical therapy may unlock lasting activity for older adults with joint pain
- Can sleep coaching speed recovery after joint replacement?
- Can hip replacement restore steady footing? a new study investigates
- Can a smartphone app outperform standard care for osteoarthritis?
- Can a Bone-Sparing hip implant outperform traditional replacement?
- Which hip implant lasts longer? a Head-to-Head trial aims to find out