New vs. old: which heart procedure works better for High-Risk patients?
NCT ID NCT07181291
Summary
This study compared two different heart ablation techniques for people who have both atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat) and heart failure. Researchers looked back at medical records from 700 patients to see if a newer technique called pulsed-field ablation works as well and is as safe as the established cryoballoon method. The goal was to help doctors choose the best procedure for these high-risk patients.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ATRIAL FIBRILLATION are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf, Germany
-
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hagen-Haspe
Hagen, Germany
-
Kerckhoff-Klinik Bad Nauheim
Bad Nauheim, Germany
-
Klinikum Fürth
Fürth, Germany
-
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Hanover, Germany
-
Montreal Heart Institute
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
-
St. Josefs-Hospital Wiesbaden
Wiesbaden, Germany
-
Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main
Frankfurt am Main, Germany
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
-
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, Germany
-
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
-
Vivantes Klinikum am Urban
Berlin, Germany
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.