Which hand rub saves more tiny lives? new trial aims to find out
NCT ID NCT07421323
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two common hand rubs—chlorhexidine and alcohol—used by medical staff before touching premature babies in the NICU. The goal is to see which one better prevents healthcare-associated infections. One hundred premature infants will be monitored with blood cultures at 7, 14, and 28 days after birth.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- chlorhexidine gluconate and alcohol hand rubs
- What this could lead to
- If this trial shows one hand rub is better, it could lead to simple changes in hand hygiene that reduce infections in vulnerable newborns.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage study with only 100 babies, so results may not apply to all hospitals. The outcome depends on staff following the hand rub routine consistently.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATED INFECTION are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Marwa Mohamed Farag
RECRUITINGAlexandria, 0325, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a higher steroid dose help preterm babies breathe easier?
- Quick blood tests could save newborns from sepsis
- Hospitals team up to solve mystery of Hard-to-Treat lung infections
- Hospital maps may slash infection spread
- Kidney injury prediction study for sick kids withdrawn before starting
- Tiny blood test could predict deadly sepsis in preterm infants