Which flap technique helps implant gums heal better? new study aims to find out

NCT ID NCT07595211

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares two common surgical techniques used to uncover dental implants during a second-stage procedure: the Apically Positioned Flap and the Rolled Flap Technique. Researchers want to see which method leads to better gum healing, thickness, and appearance over one year. Sixteen adults with two dental implants ready for uncovering will participate, with each implant receiving a different technique for direct comparison.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Apically Positioned Flap and Rolled Flap Technique (surgical procedures)
What this could lead to
If this study succeeds, it could help dentists choose the best surgical method to improve gum healing and appearance around dental implants.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study with only 16 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The procedures are routine, so no major breakthroughs are expected.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 16 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Jun 2026

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Jun 2028

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 80 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients between the ages of 18-80. 2. Non-smokers or former smokers with at least a 5-year successful cessation history. 3. Patients with normal systemic health (ASA-I) or well-controlled/stable systemic conditions (ASA-II), such as diabetes with HbA1c \< 7.0%, no recent acute myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accidents within 6 months, or any contraindication for periodontal or implant surgery. 4. Patients who had, or plan to have, 2 non-adjacent implants of the same system placed under a two-stage implant protocol. 5. The diameter discrepancy of the 2 target implants must be less than 1 mm. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Current smokers, or smokers who have quit \<5 years prior to study entry. 2. Pregnant or lactating women 3. Patients with substance or alcohol abuse 4. Patients with a history of antiresorptive therapy, head and neck radiotherapy, and chemotherapy for malignant tumors 5. Other systemic conditions or medication affecting wound healing. 6. Poor plaque control with plaque score \> 20% 7. Active/untreated odontogenic and periodontal infections 8. Implants placed, or planned to be placed, with one-stage implant protocol. 9. The diameter discrepancy of the 2 target implants is equal to or greater than 1 mm (≥ 1 mm). 10. Implants showing signs of early peri-implant bone loss or infection. 11. Severe loss of keratinized tissue (\> 50%) at the implant site 12. Non-English speaking individuals for studies involving informed consent.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Dental implant are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  2. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.