Timing is everything: fluid check delays may mislead septic shock care

NCT ID NCT02116413

First seen Nov 19, 2025 · Last updated May 15, 2026 · Updated 19 times

Summary

This study looked at 145 people with septic shock who received a standard fluid infusion over 10 minutes. Researchers wanted to see if checking the response right after the infusion versus waiting 20 minutes changed whether patients were labeled as "responders." The goal was to understand if the timing of evaluation affects treatment decisions.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for SEPTIC SHOCK are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • APHM - Hôpital Nord

    Marseille, 13915, France

  • CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau

    Nîmes, 30029, France

  • CHU d'Amiens - Hôpital Nord

    Amiens, 80054, France

  • CHU de Besançon - Hôpital Jean Minjoz

    Besançon, 25030, France

  • CHU de Caen - Hôpital Côte de Nacre

    Caen, 14033, France

  • CHU de Clermont Ferrand - Hôpital Estaing

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France

  • CHU de Clermont Ferrand - Hôpital Gabriel-Montpied

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France

  • CHU de Nantes - Hôpital Guillaume et René Laennec

    Nantes, 44093, France

  • CHU de Nice - Hôpital St-Roch

    Nice, 06001, France

Conditions

Explore the condition pages connected to this study.