Phone vs. mail: which gets more people to screen for type 1 diabetes?
NCT ID NCT07663136
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two ways of inviting people to screen for type 1 diabetes at home: a simple email or letter versus a personal phone call. Researchers want to see which method leads more people to complete and return a home screening kit. Participants are adults and children aged 1 to 99 who are already part of the Indiana Biobank.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If one recruitment method proves far more effective, future screening programs could use that approach to identify more people at risk for type 1 diabetes earlier.
- What could go wrong
- This trial only measures how many people return a screening kit, not whether screening improves health outcomes. The results may not apply to populations outside the Indiana Biobank.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HEALTHY ADULT are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Indiana University School of Medicine
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a new antibody tame the Body's allergic alarm system?
- Can Open-Source insulin systems match commercial ones without meal announcements?
- Fingerprint sweat could replace oral swabs for drug testing
- A glucose Monitor's second chance: can it tame type 1 diabetes in High-Risk teens?
- AI takes the wheel: could a smart algorithm optimize insulin pumps from home?
- Wearable tech puts hormone health to the test