Could a nasal tube replace a temporary ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery?
NCT ID NCT07821437
First seen Sep 15, 2026 · Last updated Sep 16, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
Researchers are testing whether a nasal catheter that diverts stool from the small intestine can prevent leaks after surgery for mid to low rectal cancer. The trial compares this catheter approach with a standard protective ileostomy, a temporary opening in the abdomen to divert stool. About 500 adults with rectal adenocarcinoma will be randomly assigned to one of the two methods. The main goal is to see if the catheter method is as effective as ileostomy in preventing anastomotic failure within 90 days after surgery.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- preoperative nasal bowel obstruction catheter for terminal ileum fecal diversion
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could offer a less invasive way to protect the bowel connection after rectal cancer surgery, possibly avoiding a temporary ileostomy and its complications.
- What could go wrong
- The catheter approach may fail to divert stool effectively or cause discomfort, and the trial may not show it is as good as standard ileostomy. Results may not apply to all rectal cancer patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 500 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Sep 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Sep 2029
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: I01. Aged ≥18 years, capable of understanding the study and providing written informed consent. I02. Rectal adenocarcinoma confirmed by colonoscopic biopsy. I03. The distal margin of the tumor is ≤5 cm from the anal verge as assessed by pelvic MRI, digital rectal examination and/or endoscopy; this cutoff may be extended to ≤7 cm for male patients and/or those with BMI ≥28 kg/m². I04. Treatment pathway is consistent with current guidelines and confirmed in writing by the multidisciplinary team (MDT): Patients proceeding directly to surgery without neoadjuvant therapy must be cT1-2N0, or low-risk cT3a/bN0 on pelvic MRI, with the mesorectal fascia (MRF) ≥2 mm from the tumor, negative MRI-detected extramural venous invasion (mrEMVI), no suspicious lateral lymph nodes, and no levator ani muscle/sphincter involvement. Patients who have previously received neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy without pelvic radiotherapy in accordance with guidelines may be enrolled; such treatment decision must have been made prior to study recruitment, and the MDT shall document in writing the rationale for proceeding directly to surgery\[29,30\]. I05. Planned open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted Dixon operation with primary anastomosis. I06. The attending physician judges, prior to randomization, that protective fecal diversion is indicated per current clinical practice. I07. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2; organ function and coagulation status are tolerable for the planned surgery. I08. Willingness to undergo randomization, scheduled anastomotic assessment, and a minimum of 6-month follow-up. Exclusion Criteria: E01. Emergency surgery, or presence of complete bowel obstruction requiring urgent management, bowel perforation, or uncontrolled gastrointestinal bleeding. E02. Prior pelvic radiotherapy; or high-risk features that mandate neoadjuvant therapy per current guidelines in patients without neoadjuvant treatment, including cT3c/d, cT4, N2, threatened/positive MRF, positive mrEMVI, suspicious lateral lymph nodes, or levator ani muscle/sphincter involvement; or intended to bypass indicated neoadjuvant therapy for the purpose of participating in this study. E03. Imaging or preoperative assessment indicating primary anastomosis is not feasible; planned Miles operation, Hartmann procedure, or total colectomy/proctectomy. E04. Clinical M1 disease, or other conditions requiring major concurrent surgery that substantially alters perioperative risk. E05. Prior esophageal, gastric or complex abdominal surgery, severe adhesions, upper gastrointestinal stricture, or other conditions rendering transnasal long-tube placement unacceptably risky. E06. Severe nasal/nasopharyngeal disease, risk of skull base fracture, active upper gastrointestinal bleeding, or other contraindications to transnasal intubation. E07. Uncorrected severe cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, renal insufficiency or coagulopathy. E08. Pregnancy or lactation; women of child-bearing potential unable to complete pregnancy exclusion as clinically required. E09. Known severe allergy to catheter materials or planned contrast agents with no acceptable alternative. E10. Severe psychiatric, cognitive or communication impairment without legal representative available, precluding understanding of the study or compliance with key safety measures. E11. Participation in another interventional study within 30 days prior to screening that may confound study endpoints. E12. Investigator judges the subject unsuitable for inclusion for specific safety reasons, with documentation in the screening record.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Rectal adenocarcinoma are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- New injectable drug tested against Hard-to-Treat solid tumors
- Blood test aims to catch Cancer's return earlier
- Blood test guides immunotherapy for hidden cancer cells
- Can Pre-Surgery radiation stop rectal cancer from returning?
- Can a counseling program restore intimacy after rectal cancer?
- Can extra chemo before surgery beat standard rectal cancer care?