Which workout wins? study tests High-Intensity vs. traditional training for first responders

NCT ID NCT06582251

First seen Feb 11, 2026 · Last updated Jun 22, 2026 · Updated 16 times

Summary

This study looked at how different types of exercise affect physical performance and readiness in 44 healthy young adults in a reserve officer training program. Participants did either high-intensity functional training, traditional strength training, or a mix of both for 8 weeks. Researchers measured changes in body composition, strength, and aerobic fitness to see which approach worked best.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HEALTHY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • University of South Carolina Sport Science Lab

    Columbia, South Carolina, 29208, United States

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

exercise training programs

What this could lead to

If successful, this could help identify the most effective exercise type for improving fitness and readiness in military or first responder roles.

What could go wrong

This is a small, completed study in healthy young adults, so results may not apply to older or less fit populations. No direct health treatment is being tested.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.