Can a Scope-Based drainage beat the needle for gallbladder infections?
NCT ID NCT07792486
First seen Aug 28, 2026 · Last updated Aug 28, 2026
Summary
This trial tests whether draining the gallbladder through an endoscope works better than the standard percutaneous approach for people with acute cholecystitis who are too sick for surgery. Researchers will randomly assign 212 participants to receive either endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage with a metal stent or percutaneous drainage through the skin. The study tracks serious complications, the need for extra procedures, and quality of life over a year. The goal is to find which method offers a safer, more comfortable recovery.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) with lumen-apposing metal stents, compared to percutaneous gallbladder drainage (PT-GBD)
- What this could lead to
- If EUS-guided drainage proves better, it could become the preferred option for people with acute cholecystitis who cannot have surgery, leading to fewer complications and a better quality of life.
- What could go wrong
- This is a randomized trial, but the outcome depends on the skill of the specialists and the specific condition of each patient. The results may not apply to all hospitals or patients, and both procedures carry risks like bleeding or infection.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 212 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Aug 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Oct 2029
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * ≥ 18 years * Definite diagnosis of acute cholecystitis following the Tokyo guidelines * Poor surgical patients, not eligible for acute cholecystectomy according to their surgeon, with indication for gallbladder drainage.b The reason for ineligibility is recorded. * Possibility to obtain written informed consent from the patient or their legal representative. * Drainage with both modalities is technically feasible (i.e. the gallbladder can be accessed with both techniques), as assessed by the treating physician and/or expert panel. Exclusion Criteria: * Presence of a non-sealed perforated gallbladder. In case of a sealed perforation, patients can be included after assessment of an expert panel. * Need of dual treatment with both modalities, already established beforehand. * Prior gallbladder drainage attempts. * Surgically altered anatomy (i.e. alterations to the oesophagus, stomach and duodenum). * The presence of contraindications to either drainage modality, unless it is a temporary problem that can be mitigated beforehand (i.e. ascites drainage prior to percutaneous drainage). * Permanently incapacitated and therefore inability to fill out the quality of life surveys.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Cholecystitis, acute are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Netherlands
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a second ultrasound spot hidden gallbladder trouble?
- Could conscious sedation replace general anesthesia for gallbladder drainage?
- Can a structured recovery plan speed healing after emergency gallbladder surgery?
- Keyhole surgery debate: which exit wound is best for gallbladder removal?
- New study tests endoscopic gallbladder drainage as surgery alternative
- New endoscopic procedure may offer better Long-Term relief for gallbladder patients too sick for surgery