Toothbrush showdown: electric beats manual for kids with dental appliances?
NCT ID NCT07196969
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tested whether electric or manual toothbrushes work better for children who have space maintainers (devices that hold space for permanent teeth). Sixty-eight kids aged 6-12 used either an electric or manual toothbrush for 3 months. Researchers checked plaque, gum health, and levels of cavity-causing bacteria in saliva. The goal was to see which brush keeps mouths healthier.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- electric toothbrush and manual toothbrush
- What this could lead to
- If electric toothbrushes prove better, this could help dentists recommend the best brushing method for children with space maintainers to improve oral hygiene.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial with only 68 children, so results may not apply to all kids. The study only lasted 3 months, so long-term benefits are unknown.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
84 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jul 2022
- Finished
-
Apr 2023
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
6 to 12 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Children aged 6-12 years who required a space maintainer due to premature loss of primary molar teeth were included if they were medically healthy; had no periodontal disease, temporomandibular disorders, bruxism, abnormal oral habits, or physical/mental disabilities affecting hand movement; were not on regular medication; had not used antibiotics within the past three months or plaque-preventive agents within the last six months; and were able to comply with scheduled follow-up visits. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients who failed to attend follow-up appointments or developed an infection/disease requiring antibiotic therapy during the study were excluded.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Oral microbial colonization are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Pamukkale University Faculty of Dentistry
Denizli, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Green tea rinse put to the test against braces bad breath
- Braces vs. clear aligners: which is gentler on your gums?
- Could saliva hold the key to understanding gum disease?
- Dental thread tested: can a retraction cord protect gums during fillings?
- Dentists test Gum-Friendly tooth repair technique
- Gum health showdown: fixed vs removable retainers after braces