Two surgical approaches face off for early rectal cancer treatment
NCT ID NCT02885142
Summary
This study aimed to compare two different surgical techniques for removing early-stage rectal cancer and precancerous growths. Researchers wanted to see whether endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) worked better for complete removal and long-term results. The trial included 368 people with early rectal tumors and was designed to provide clearer evidence on which approach might be more effective.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ANAL CANCER are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille
Marseille, 13354, France
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.