Calibration check: does Fine-Tuning muscle monitors make a difference?
NCT ID NCT04911088
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at whether calibrating a muscle monitor (EMG) improves how accurately it measures muscle function during anesthesia. 66 adults having surgery took part. The goal was to see if calibration is needed for reliable readings and to find the minimum anesthesia depth required.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKADE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University Hospital Ulm
Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, 89073, Germany
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a simple skin scrub sharpen surgical monitoring?
- Can a new drug improve muscle relaxation during surgery?
- Do two muscle monitors tell the same story?
- Which monitor best tracks deep muscle paralysis during keyhole surgery?
- Which monitor best measures muscle relaxation on the operating table?
- Spine surgery study tests best way to use muscle relaxants for safer monitoring