Scarred abdomen? study tests safer laparoscopy entry
NCT ID NCT07473934
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two common techniques for starting a laparoscopic procedure in people who have had previous abdominal or pelvic surgeries. One method uses a Veress needle to inflate the belly before inserting the camera, while the other inserts the camera directly. The goal is to see which approach is faster and causes fewer complications. The trial will enroll 88 adults with prior abdominal scars.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If this trial shows one method is clearly safer or faster, it could help surgeons choose the best technique for patients with scarred abdomens.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage trial with only 88 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Both methods carry risks like injury to organs or blood vessels.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPY are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.