Looking back: did a new wound treatment save money and limbs?
NCT ID NCT05135130
Summary
This study looked back at the medical records of 160 people who had diabetic foot ulcers and were in a previous trial. The goal was to compare the total medical costs and amputation rates between two different wound treatments: a new cream called ON101 and a standard dressing called Aquacel. The study did not test a new treatment but analyzed real-world costs and outcomes from past care.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DIABETIC FOOT ULCER are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
China Medical University Hospital
Taichung, 404, Taiwan
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.