AI cuts radiation in lung scans while keeping image quality

NCT ID NCT07035977

First seen Jan 06, 2026 · Last updated Jun 20, 2026 · Updated 28 times

Summary

This study tested a deep-learning system called DeepPriorCBCT that aims to produce high-quality lung CT images using only one-sixth of the usual radiation dose. 138 adults getting a lung biopsy under CT guidance received both a standard-dose scan and a low-dose scan, and radiologists compared the image quality. The goal is to see if the AI can safely reduce radiation exposure without compromising the ability to spot lung nodules.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for LUNG NODULES are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • The First Affiliated Hospital East Campus of Zhengzhou University

    Zhengzhou, Henan, China

  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University

    Zhengzhou, Henan, China

  • Wuhan Union Hospital

    Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, China

  • Wuhan Union Jinyin Lake Hospital

    Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, China

  • Wuhan Union West Hospital

    Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, China

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

DeepPriorCBCT deep-learning model for low-dose CBCT image reconstruction

What this could lead to

If successful, this could lead to safer, lower-radiation CT scans for diagnosing lung nodules without losing image quality.

What could go wrong

This is an early-stage validation study with 138 participants, so results may not apply to all patients or settings. The model may not match standard image quality in practice.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.