Bladder-Sparing hope: cystoscopy tested to spot Cancer-Free bladders before surgery

NCT ID NCT02968732

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing This study
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Sep 21, 2026 ยท Last updated Sep 21, 2026

Summary

Researchers at Fox Chase Cancer Center are testing whether a standardized cystoscopy exam with tissue sampling, done right before radical cystectomy, can reliably predict which bladder tumors have disappeared (pT0). The study enrolls 65 adults with urothelial carcinoma scheduled for bladder removal. If the scoring system proves accurate, it could help identify patients who might safely keep their bladder instead of having it removed.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
standardized cystoscopic evaluation with tissue sampling
What this could lead to
If the scoring system proves reliable, doctors could identify patients whose tumors appear gone before surgery, opening the door to bladder preservation instead of removal.
What could go wrong
Cystoscopy may miss microscopic disease, and the scoring system is new and unproven. The study is small, so results may not apply broadly.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

65 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Nov 2016

Expected to finish

Apr 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Male or female patients age \>18 years at the time of consent. 2. Patients with a diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma clinical stage T1-T4NanyM0. 3. Patients must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-3. 4. Patients must have a clinical decision to proceed with radical cystectomy by any conventional approach (open, laparoscopic, robot-assisted laparoscopic). Time from decision to surgery is usually 3-8 weeks for those who do not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 10-14 weeks for those who receive neo-adjuvant chemotherapy treatment. During this time, eligibility for study participation will be verified. 5. Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent and HIPAA authorization document or a legally authorized representative who has the ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent and HIPAA authorization on behalf of the participant. 6. Women of reproductive potential must have agreed to use an effective contraceptive measure. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients who undergo cystectomy with non-curative intent will be excluded. 2. Patients who have undergone any prior pelvic irradiation. 3. Patients who are pregnant or nursing. Radical cystectomy and prolonged general anesthesia would place the fetus at considerable risk of demise. The prolonged recovery and debility of the patient would severely limit the patient's ability to nurse and care for an infant.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Urothelial carcinoma are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Fox Chase Cancer Center

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.