Could a simple screening strategy uncover hidden TB in COPD patients?
NCT ID NCT07706972
First seen Jul 16, 2026 · Last updated Jul 17, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial evaluates an active case-finding strategy to detect pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) among people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in primary care clinics in Henan, China. The strategy uses computer-aided diagnosis and a rapid TB test during routine COPD visits. The study aims to see if this approach finds more TB cases than usual care and to understand how common COPD-TB comorbidity is in this population.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- an active case-finding strategy using computer-aided diagnosis and GeneXpert testing
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this approach could help identify tuberculosis earlier in people with COPD, potentially reducing the spread of TB and improving treatment outcomes.
- What could go wrong
- The trial is observational in design and focuses on a specific region in China, so results may not apply elsewhere. The screening strategy may also face practical challenges in real-world primary care settings.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 25,000 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Jul 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Jun 2029
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. aged 18 years or older; 2. residence in the local area for at least six months; 3. providing written informed consent to participate in the study. Exclusion Criteria: 1. inability to provide informed consent or complete the questionnaire; 2. contraindications to CT scanning; 3. current pregnancy.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The official record
The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A single swab, two diseases: rapid test takes on TB and COVID-19
- Can a new inhaler match Symbicort's performance?
- Gentler exercise with a twist: could a tourniquet boost balance in lung disease?
- Can HIV status change TB treatment success? a zambian study investigates
- Personalized exercise plans could boost COPD recovery
- Can a nasal oxygen device prevent dangerous dips in blood oxygen during endoscopy for COPD patients?