Heart patch vs. standard ECG: which catches dangerous rhythms better?

NCT ID NCT04336644

First seen Jan 09, 2026 · Last updated May 14, 2026 · Updated 18 times

Summary

This study compares a continuous heart monitor patch to standard electrocardiograms (ECGs) in 60 patients taking medications that can cause dangerous heart rhythms. The goal is to see if the patch provides more accurate and timely detection of heart issues. Participants include people with certain cancers starting drugs like arsenic trioxide, capecitabine, or ribociclib.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for LONG QT SYNDROME are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • Washington University School of Medicine

    RECRUITING

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

    Contact

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Conditions

Explore the condition pages connected to this study.