Pacemaker implant showdown: Ultrasound-Guided puncture vs. traditional dissection

NCT ID NCT07273929

First seen Jan 02, 2026 · Last updated May 15, 2026 · Updated 23 times

Summary

This study compares three ways to reach a vein when putting in a pacemaker or defibrillator for the first time. About 900 adults will be randomly assigned to one of three techniques: ultrasound-guided puncture from inside the incision, ultrasound-guided puncture through the skin, or the standard cut-down method. The goal is to see which approach is most successful and causes the fewest complications.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PRIMARY IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRACARDIAC ELECTRONIC DEVICE INDICATION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • CH Annexy-Genevois, site Annecy

    Metz, 74000, France

    Contact

  • CHU Clermont-Ferrand

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France

    Contact

  • CHU de Saint Etienne - Hôpital Nord

    Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42800, France

    Contact

  • Hôpital F. MITTERRAND

    Dijon, 21000, France

  • Hôpital privé Jacques Cartier

    Massy, 91300, France

    Contact

  • Lyon-Croix Rousse

    Lyon, 69004, France

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

    Contact

  • Lyon-Louis Pradel

    Lyon, 69500, France

    Contact

Conditions

Explore the condition pages connected to this study.