Ultrasound-Guided vein access: which route is safer?
NCT ID NCT03162757
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compared two ultrasound-guided methods for inserting a central venous catheter: one through the lower part of the internal jugular vein and the other through the subclavian vein. Researchers wanted to see which approach is more successful and safer. The study involved 210 adults who needed a central line, and it tracked complications like collapsed lung, bleeding, and infection.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could help doctors choose the best vein access method, reducing complications like collapsed lung or bleeding.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small pilot study, so results may not apply to all patients. The main risk is that one method might cause more complications than the other.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CENTRAL VENOUS ACCESS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
CHU Nimes
Nîmes, 30029, France