Ultrasound-Guided vein access: which route is safer?

NCT ID NCT03162757

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compared two ultrasound-guided methods for inserting a central venous catheter: one through the lower part of the internal jugular vein and the other through the subclavian vein. Researchers wanted to see which approach is more successful and safer. The study involved 210 adults who needed a central line, and it tracked complications like collapsed lung, bleeding, and infection.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to

If successful, this study could help doctors choose the best vein access method, reducing complications like collapsed lung or bleeding.

What could go wrong

This is a small pilot study, so results may not apply to all patients. The main risk is that one method might cause more complications than the other.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CENTRAL VENOUS ACCESS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • CHU Nimes

    Nîmes, 30029, France