Stent showdown: which device heals arteries better after a heart attack?

NCT ID NCT03440801

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026

Summary

This study compared two drug-coated stents (Synergy and Xience) in 240 people who had a heart attack. The goal was to see which stent leads to better artery healing over three years, focusing on plaque buildup inside the stent. Both stents release a drug to prevent scarring, but one has a coating that dissolves over time.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

everolimus-eluting stents (Synergy and Xience)

What this could lead to

If one stent shows better long-term healing, it could reduce the risk of future heart problems after a heart attack.

What could go wrong

This is a small, completed study with 240 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Stents carry risks like blood clots or re-narrowing.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for STEMI - ST ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

ST-elevation myocardial infarction

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Tokorozawa Heart Center

    Tokorozawa, 3591142, Japan