Simulation showdown: which training method teaches blood gas testing better?
NCT ID NCT06493188
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study will test whether a realistic, high-tech simulation (using an actor and a medical training room) helps medical and nursing students learn arterial blood gas testing better than a low-tech paper-based discussion. Thirty-six early-career students will be randomly assigned to one of the two training methods. The goal is to see which approach improves practical skills, confidence, and teamwork.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University of Torino - Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences
Orbassano, Torino, 10043, Italy
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Teaching teens to navigate transit may boost activity and heart health
- Can a simple test predict which Doctors-in-Training need help?
- Boosting breastfeeding confidence in teen moms: a new approach put to the test
- Simulated patients, real skills: a new training approach for future nurses
- Can a simple cloth pad transform menstrual health for millions?
- Can resilience protect physiotherapists from burnout? a nationwide survey investigates