3D-Printed vs. milled plates: which is better for broken jaws?
NCT ID NCT07263633
First seen Dec 11, 2025 · Last updated May 14, 2026 · Updated 28 times
Summary
This study looked at two different methods for making custom metal plates used to fix broken jawbones. Sixteen patients with fractures in the front part of the lower jaw were treated with plates made either by 3D printing (additive) or by milling from a solid block (subtractive). The goal was to see which method produced stronger plates and led to better healing and recovery.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ANTERIOR MANDIBULAR FRACTURE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University
Tanta, Gharbia Governorate, 31527, Egypt
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.