Which hip surgery route is best? new study aims to find out

NCT ID NCT04900506

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 25, 2026

Summary

This study compares two surgical techniques (posterior SPAIRE and anterior approach) for treating broken hips in people aged 70–90. Researchers will measure recovery, muscle damage, and bone density changes in 210 participants. The goal is to see if one approach leads to better outcomes, helping surgeons choose the best method for each patient.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for MUSCLE DAMAGE are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Sorlandet Hospital

    Arendal, Norway

  • Sorlandet hospital

    Kristiansand, Norway

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

surgical procedure (posterior SPAIRE approach vs. anterior approach)

What this could lead to

If one approach proves better, it could guide surgeons to choose the method that leads to faster recovery and fewer complications for hip fracture patients.

What could go wrong

This is a relatively small, single-center study, and results may not apply to all hospitals or patient groups. The study is also observational in nature, so it cannot prove cause and effect.

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

femoral neck fracture

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.