Heart ablation showdown: which method prevents stroke better?
NCT ID NCT06253000
First seen May 09, 2026 · Last updated May 13, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two common procedures (radiofrequency and cryoablation) for treating persistent atrial fibrillation, a heart rhythm problem that raises stroke risk. Researchers will track 158 adults over 24 months to see which method better prevents strokes, mini-strokes, and other complications. The goal is to find the most effective way to control the condition and reduce long-term risks.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for STROKE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Study contacts
-
Contact
Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Locations
-
Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
RECRUITINGMoscow, 121552, Russia
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.