Which workout wins for tactical fitness? study puts training styles to the test

NCT ID NCT06582251

Completed Knowledge-focused Sponsor: University of South Carolina Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looked at how different types of exercise affect physical performance and readiness in 44 healthy young adults in a reserve officer training program. Participants were split into three groups: high-intensity functional training, traditional strength training, or a mix of strength and aerobic training. Over 8 weeks, researchers measured changes in body composition, strength, and aerobic capacity to see which approach works best.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: exercise training programs
What this could lead to: If this trial succeeds, it could help identify the most effective exercise type for improving physical performance and readiness in military or tactical roles.
What could go wrong: This is a small, completed study in healthy young adults, so results may not apply to other populations or real-world tactical settings.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HEALTHY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

HEALTHY

Contacts and locations

Locations

University of South Carolina Sport Science Lab

Columbia, South Carolina, 29208, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.