Surgeons test which esophageal cancer surgery works better
NCT ID NCT04217239
Summary
This study compared two different minimally invasive surgery approaches for treating esophageal cancer. Researchers wanted to see which method—Ivor-Lewis or McKeown—had fewer complications, shorter recovery times, and better long-term results. The study involved 272 patients with lower esophageal or stomach junction cancers to determine which surgical technique provides better outcomes.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ESOPHAGEAL CANCER are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Yunpeng Zhao
Jinan, Shandong, 250033, China
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.