Emergency intubation showdown: which method saves more oxygen?
NCT ID NCT07380763
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study compares two ways to place a breathing tube in emergency patients who are still breathing on their own but need help. The methods are Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) and Delayed Sequence Intubation (DSI). Researchers will measure oxygen levels, complications, and survival in 140 adults. The goal is to find out which method is safer and more effective.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If this trial succeeds, it could show which intubation method is safer and more effective for non-trauma patients, potentially improving emergency care guidelines.
- What could go wrong
- This is a single-center study with 140 participants, so results may not apply to all settings. The study is observational in nature and does not test a new drug or device.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 140 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Oct 2025
- Expected to finish
-
Jun 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Aged 18 years or older 2. Presence of spontaneous breathing. 3. No prediction of a difficult airway prior to intubation. 4. Requirement for advanced airway management. 5. Not in cardiac arrest. 6. Decided to intubate due to non-traumatic etiologies. 7. Planned intubation using ketamine for sedation and rocuronium for paralysis. 8. Decision to intubate due to one of the following clinical conditions: 1. Acute Respiratory Failure: Patients with hypoxic or hypercapnic respiratory failure where adequate oxygenation cannot be achieved despite non-invasive ventilation. 2. Inability to Protect the Airway: Altered level of consciousness or increased risk of pulmonary aspiration due to conditions such as upper gastrointestinal bleeding, ileus, volvulus, gastric outlet obstruction, hypersalivation, or hyperemesis. 3. Shock States: Patients in any state of shock (hypovolemic, distributive, cardiogenic, obstructive) exhibiting severe altered mental status or declining respiratory status. 4. Neuroprotection: Need to terminate ongoing seizures resistant to medical therapy (status epilepticus), or situations requiring strict control of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO₂) levels to manage increased intracranial pressure (ICP) in non-traumatic conditions (such as intracranial hemorrhage or severe encephalopathy). 9. Obtaining informed consent from the patient or their legally authorized representative. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Aged under 18 years. 2. Pregnancy. 3. Refusal to provide informed consent. 4. Cardiac arrest prior to intubation. 5. Anticipated difficult airway. 6. Intubation required due to traumatic etiologies. 7. Missing or incomplete patient data. 8. Patients assigned to the DSI protocol but for whom the decision to intubate was rescinded due to clinical improvement during the preoxygenation phase. 9. Use of a sedative agent other than ketamine for the RSI protocol. 10. Intubations performed by practitioners who have not received study-specific training on DSI and RSI protocols. 11. Duplicate enrollment due to recurrent presentations during the study period.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute respiratory failure are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
4 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital
RECRUITINGIstanbul, Istanbul, 34170, Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Research and Training Hospital
RECRUITINGIstanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
-
İstanbul Haseki Training and Research Hospital
RECRUITINGIstanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital
RECRUITINGIstanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A global effort to make moving critically ill patients safer
- Healing together: could a Couples-Based program ease ICU aftermath?
- Radiation-Free brain imaging for kids? ultrasound may offer a safer path
- Are ventilated patients starving in silence? a new study investigates
- Can a simple inhaled combo keep pneumonia patients off ventilators?
- Can a Diaphragm-Sensing ventilator mode reduce breathing asynchrony?