Which breathing aid works best for tiny preemies? new study compares two methods.

NCT ID NCT04698473

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study looked at 85 very premature babies (24-29 weeks) with breathing problems to compare two types of non-invasive breathing support: nasal CPAP and nasal IPPV. Both methods deliver surfactant (a lung treatment) without a breathing tube. The goal was to see which method reduces the need for a breathing machine within 72 hours. The study found no clear winner, but helps doctors understand options for these fragile infants.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Hilal Ozkan

    Bursa, Select..., 16285, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.