Face-off: which collagen injection wins for Younger-Looking skin?

NCT ID NCT07202117

Recruiting now Symptom relief Sponsor: Erevna Innovations Inc. Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares two popular injectable treatments—Sculptra (PLLA) and Radiesse (CaHA)—to see which one better improves skin elasticity and appearance on the face and chest. Forty-five adults with mild to severe skin aging will receive both treatments in different areas and be monitored for changes in skin firmness and satisfaction. The goal is to help people choose the best option for rejuvenating aging skin.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: Poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) and calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA) injections
What this could lead to: If this trial succeeds, it could show which collagen stimulator works better for improving skin firmness and reducing wrinkles on the face and chest.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-phase trial with only 45 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Both treatments are already approved for cosmetic use, so no major new risks are expected.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for AESTHETIC are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

AESTHETIC

Contacts and locations

Show contact details

Locations

Erevna Innovations Inc.
RECRUITING

Montreal, Quebec, H3Z 1C3, Canada

Contact Email: •••••@•••••

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.