Where is safer for dialysis catheters: ER or dialysis unit?
NCT ID NCT07645365
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study looked at 398 adults who needed a temporary dialysis catheter, comparing those who got it in the emergency department versus those who got it in the dialysis unit. Researchers tracked infections and blood clots in the catheter for 10 days after placement. The goal is to see if one location leads to fewer complications, which could guide hospital practices.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If this study finds a clear difference in complication rates, it could help hospitals decide the safest place to insert dialysis catheters.
- What could go wrong
- This is an observational study, not a controlled experiment, so it can only show links, not prove cause and effect. Results may not apply to all hospitals or patient groups.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University of Health Sciences, Antalya Training and Research Hospital
Antalya, konyaaltı, 07100, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Which vein is safer for chemotherapy ports? a trial aims to settle the debate
- New catheter lock could slash infection risk for cancer patients
- Kidney risk after lung surgery: new clues from 150 patients
- Simple sugar may shield catheter users from painful infections
- Protein puzzle: can diet help kidneys recover in the ICU?
- New bandage for IVs could slash infection risk